![]() Brown is a nice find in support and generally everyone is OK for what is required. Walters is a bit too sickly cute for my liking but within the context of Luhrmann's world, he just about works even if he was a bit too front and centre within the film. Sure she is convincingly dry and uptight at the start but she doesn't loosen in a way that works that well. By contrast Kidman doesn't quite pull it off. Jackman is not "great" in traditional terms but his beefy, chiselled frame plays well to the broad matinée idol type that he must deliver as. The direction and cinematography drive this but the cast help. Although they don't mix that well, the camp style is woven into some aspects to prevent it becoming dry, unlikely and wooden in the way that it did in Pearl Harbour. That said, it somehow does work and generally I got caught up in the sweep and majesty of the whole thing caring about the characters, touched by the slight magic in the story and the delivery. To some this will be just part of the magic of the film but for me it got a bit tiresome and felt like too much had been thrown into the pot. Here one rather affects the other and the "big real story" sits uncomfortably with "unlikely sweeping narrative gestures" and "mystical power of the Aborigine". The truth is perhaps a little less impressive because the mix of the epic and the fanciful doesn't come off for Luhrmann as well as it has in other films. In this regard the film works because there is a lot going on and, despite one's reservations, it feels like we are watching this epic film that is important and emotional and creative. We get massive spectacle, sweeping emotion, ethnic mysticism and constant unreal cinematography that makes the whole thing look gorgeous to the point of being unreal. ![]() The film wears its epic feel like a big coat and it covers it completely to the point that there is no denying the ambition of Luhrmann. The bad news is that it still isn't a fantastic film so much as it is the type of film that one likes despite it all, not because of it. The good news is that Australia is better than Pearl Harbour. If alarm bells are ringing for you then they were for me as well, since this concept reminded me a bit of Pearl Harbour that terribly wooden affair that dragged on far too long to be able to cover the problems with big explosions. Our story is an traditional "epic" romance in the mould of many old films where the rough hero and the cut-glass woman fall for one another against a backdrop of cattle drives and war. I say this fits Australia because in truth much of Baz Luhrmann's film could be accused of being just that bloated, silly, sweeping, moving, engaging but ultimately quite light in the substance department. ![]() Australia came out between Christmas and New Year in the UK and this was quite befitting it as this is the time when the television usually has those fluffy but expensive specials and epic productions clogging it up, all with the excuse of being perfect "doze in front of the telly" stuff for the wake of eating too much.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |